Opinion: Improving patient safety shouldn’t be a financial calculation
A recent study of medical error published in The New England Journal of Medicine reached a shocking conclusion about patient safety: Nearly a quarter century after a highly publicized Institute of Medicine report on the prevalence of patient harm sparked vows to cut the rate by half in five years, “in-hospital adverse events” remain so common that they affect roughly one in four patients. At larger institutions, the rate can be 40% or higher.
“The safety movement has, at best, stalled,” an accompanying editorial acknowledged, while urging hospital leaders to hold themselves accountable to a “sacred obligation.”
Information Courtesy By: Michael L. Millenson, #HealthcareNews #Healthcare | Feeds
A recent study of medical error published in The New England Journal of Medicine reached a shocking conclusion about patient safety: Nearly a quarter century after a highly publicized Institute of Medicine report on the prevalence of patient harm sparked vows to cut the rate by half in five years, “in-hospital adverse events” remain so common that they affect roughly one in four patients. At larger institutions, the rate can be 40% or higher.
“The safety movement has, at best, stalled,” an accompanying editorial acknowledged, while urging hospital leaders to hold themselves accountable to a “sacred obligation.”
Click For More Details
2023-02-17 15:30
Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Healthcare Central is published from a syndicated feed.